Tag: Planning

  • Reprieve for Histon & Impington as planners aim to preserve village character

    Reprieve for Histon & Impington as planners aim to preserve village character

    All 23 sites put forward by land owners for potential residential and business development in Histon & Impington have been rejected by Greater Cambridge planners in their first draft proposals for the region’s Local Plan, including ambitions for Cambridge Science Park to be extended into the village.

    Trinity College proposals for a 400-acre Research and Development campus in Green Belt land south of Milton Road, Impington, are among those that would not get the go-ahead if the draft proposals are finalised. Among a range of objections, planners found the development “would have a significant adverse impact to the wide and local landscape character views and visual amenity.” It would, they said, be “a significant encroachment in the landscape”, including “permanent removal of agricultural open fields and an urbanisation of rural countryside.” They also concluded there is “no capacity for growth” of traffic relating to the site, and that if any plans were to be approved, they would “need to ensure no net increase in vehicles trips on the Strategic Road Network.” Nonetheless Trinity College has a 20-year option on the land and is thought likely to appeal any planning constraints that arise.

    Community playing field
    Former Infant School playing field on New School Road – not available for housing development.

    Planners have also turned down sites suggested by Chivers off Milton Road and all the sites proposed by Cambridgeshire County Council, including the land at Buxhall Farm adjacent to Park Primary School and the Infants’ School, playing field and Early Years Centre in New School Road. Other sites rejected include land around Cambridge Road, Clay Close Lane, Impington Lane, Woodcock Close, Cottenham Road, Park Lane and Croft Close.

    Advert

    READ ALSO: Landowners offer sites for potential new-builds ; Playing field saved for the community; Celebrations as Abbey Fields sale reaches completion; Science Park plans to extend into the village

    The proposals will now be considered by Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire District councillors through their respective committee processes. A final list of sites will be put out for public consultation at the beginning of November. Residents’ involvement in the process will be vital to ensuring that the interests of the village are respected and unwanted development sites don’t creep back into the Local Plan at a later stage.

    Wider impact

    The Local Plan will determine where new homes and jobs in the region will be developed to 2041 and beyond. Almost 900 potential sites were suggested by developers, landowners and planners, but after testing them against criteria including flood risk, transport, biodiversity and heritage impacts, only 19 have been chosen.

    The proposals are rooted in extensive public consultation carried out in early 2020, when respondents overwhelmingly said that climate change was the top priority for the plan. As a result, the proposed sites are those that planners believe are most likely to minimise carbon emissions, maximise biodiversity and enable green space improvements, while achieving central government-imposed goals for growth in the region.

    The sites proposed for all new homes and jobs in Cambridge and South Cambridgeshire are close to high quality public transport and within walking and cycling distance of local destinations and services, to minimise future car use and set “a clear path to a net zero carbon future”. But they come with a clear warning to central government that the scale of new building will depend on urgently increasing the area’s future water supply

    Although most new sites have been suggested in and around Cambridge, the new towns of Northstowe, Cambourne and Waterbeach would also continue to be developed. One of the objectives of the Local Plan is to protect the rural character of the villages, and only 4% of homes – 384 in total over the next 20 years – would be on sites in rural areas.

    Only 4 sites would build on Green Belt land – including an extension to the biomedical campus around Addenbrooke’s hospital. 40% of the homes built on sites which provide 10 homes or more would be social rent, affordable rent, shared ownership or discounted market sale properties.

    Concerns

    Current development sites already underway in the region will deliver around 1,770 new homes per year up to 2041, including the new housing at Darwin Green, across the A14 from Impington. On top of this, the Local Plan needs to allocate sites for another 550 homes a year in order for housing to keep pace with the increase in jobs in the area. 

    Although the scale of development proposals for the region is daunting – and the draft Plan certainly won’t be welcome by all – there could be serious consequences if communities and Councils don’t accept it.

    The increase in local jobs has outstripped the amount of housing being built and that housing has become even less affordable, leading to increasing commuting. Under national planning rules, Local Plans need to demonstrate that they will meet local needs for housing. If they don’t, then unwanted speculative development may have to be permitted in places that damage the environment and disturb communities.

    Cllr Dr. Tumi Hawkins, Lead Member for Planning at South Cambridgeshire District Council, explained: “The government requires us to meet the number of new homes that the evidence is showing us are needed. If we do not, the plan may not be signed off by the government’s planning inspectors, and we may end up having to accept developers’ proposals for homes in locations that could harm the environment. And without planning for homes where and when they are needed, we will see increases in house prices, rent and pollution as people will have to travel further. These proposals aim to achieve a greener way of living.”

    The Greater Cambridge Local Plan is being developed by the Greater Cambridge Shared Planning Service, a partnership between Cambridge City and South Cambridgeshire District Councils. The proposed sites are available to view here.

    Planners’ assessments of the development sites put forward in Histon (from p184) & Impington (from p278) can be found here.

  • Planning permission refused for Station Stores site

    Planners have firmly rejected proposals for demolishing Kendal Court – the buildings around Station Stores on Cambridge Road, Impington – and redeveloping the area with high density residential accommodation.

    Developers had applied for permission to develop the whole site with a building containing 28 apartments and two commercial units, in an L-shaped configuration at the corner of Cambridge Road and the guided busway.

    But planning officers for South Cambridgeshire have provided 7 grounds for planning permission to be refused.

    Advert

    Objections

    The Parish Council has been a vocal objector to the proposals. On behalf of the community, it made 27 objections to the original plans, and 24 objections to the revised version submitted to planners when it became clear that the initial proposal failed to adequately address local needs and concerns, or meet the requirements of the Village Design Guide.

    Among the issues it raised were the absence of affordable housing; inadequate parking provision; and the density of residential accommodation that would be created in the area surrounding the former railway station, where more than 50 new properties have either been built or are under construction on the former Bishop’s site opposite. It also commented on the strain a development of this scale would place on the already-overstretched doctor’s surgery, and the loss of business premises in the area, which was formerly home to Anglia Fireplaces as well as Station Stores and Richard Stebbings Funeral Service.

    Others who objected to the plans included the Local Highway Authority, which expressed concerns about vehicle manoeuvring from the site to the road, and the Local Flood Authority, unhappy about surface water drainage arrangements.  

    35 residents responded to the public consultation, commenting on issues including inadequate provision for cyclists and the visual impact of the four-storey development on the area.

    Planners also felt that the private and communal outdoor amenity space available to residents in the properties would be inadequate.

    READ ALSO: Urgent: feedback sought on public consultation for Kendal Court site
    Planners to decide on proposals for Station Stores site

    Next steps

    The developers who own the site are now faced with choices about how to proceed.

    While they could appeal the decision, success seems unlikely given the number of reasons given for rejecting the proposed scheme.

    They could adjust the proposal and resubmit, or alternatively – unless they choose to sell the site on to someone else – they will need to go back to the drawing board to come up with a scheme that addresses the points raised by planners.  

    Parish Council chair Denis Payne commented: “We are delighted that this particular scheme has been rejected. The site is designated as an area for mixed development, so that the area around the guided busway stop could become a gateway to the village, with destination businesses creating a lively 7am to 10pm area.

    “The proposed plans would have added a significant amount of residential accommodation but not provided the associated amenities and facilities that a growing village needs, and did nothing to address the serious problem of affordable local housing.

    “It seems likely that the developers will offer an alternative scheme, and we hope they will take this fully into consideration before resubmitting ideas for the site.”    

  • 4 New Roles for Demand Planning Analyst, Engineering Team Leader, Process Engineer and CI Lead – Hain Daniels

    4 New Roles for Demand Planning Analyst, Engineering Team Leader, Process Engineer and CI Lead – Hain Daniels

    Hain Daniels who make sweet spreads and jellies including Hartley’s jams, Gale’s honey, Rose’s marmalades and Sun-Pat peanut butter in Histon are looking for four new roles.

    Demand Planning Analyst on a fixed term contract to work closely with the commercial teams to ensure an accurate forecast, analyse trends, and monitor forecasts to ensure efficiency throughout the business.

    Engineering Shift Team Leader to coordinate all aspects of Production Engineering with shift team members to deliver improved plant performance of production. 

    Advert

    Process Engineer to develop and implement process improvement strategies to meet Site and Department 3 year Process Improvement plans.

    CI Lead to be Continuous Improvement Leader and enable delivery of gross productivity targets in the order of 10% cost reduction year-on-year ongoing.